Assets and Liabilities
In the personal
financial statement, there are 2 other components that determines your
actual net worth, namely assets and liabilities. Now what are assets
and liabilities? Before we move on to this, lets explore the
definition of passive income.
Passive income is
defined as nett income generated from an investment after deducting all
expenses required to maintain the investment. It is generally only
valid for investments that does not require significant amount of time
and effort to continue generating income. Examples of investments that
generates passive income are businesses, rental properties, high
dividend stocks, bonds etc. For example, a house that is rented for
$2,200 and total expenses of $1,850 cash flow or passive income of $350
is generated. In contrast, if the same house is rented at $1,800,
there is no passive income as the cash flow from the house is -$50.
This brings us to the
definition of Assets and Liabilities.
Assets - defined as
investments that generates passive income or positive cash flow
Liabilities - defined as
expenses/ investments that generates negative cash flow
What role does this play
in the personal financial statement?
Assets increases income,
which means more money can be placed in savings, which can be used to
generate even higher returns. On the contrary, liabilities increases
expenses, which reduces savings, an hence your wealth is also reduced.
The basis of generating
wealth is to buy in more assets that generates passive income, which
will improve your financial status. Furthermore, once sufficient
passive income is generated, that is above your current level of
expenses, you are financially free, and can maintain your current level
of lifestyle even if you stop working totally.
What does this mean?
For example, my total expenses is $1,250. Currently, my passive income
is derived purely from my rental property, which translates to $350.
Lets say I donated all my money to charity but my business idea come to
fruitation, and generates another $900 in passive income, and I
continue working at my current job, with my current take home pay of
$3588, I will be able to put $3588 to work for me every month. In
another year, at a rate of return of 20% per annum, I will have $47k in
investment. I then leave my job to start a business that generates no
income for one year. In that year, at zero income, I can still live
my current level of life and STILL grow my investment to $56k. This is
just one of the possible scenario that may happen (in fact that's the
plan I'm currently working along), and it shows the importance of
owning passive income, which allows you to do things you want to do
with no worries behind you.
Lets say for a different
example. I feel rich as I have $3588 in active income and $350 in
passive income, expenses remains at $1,250 and I purchased a flat for
myself at $400k. I pay $1,350 a month as installment and maintenance
for the flat. This means I have a investable income of $1,338. I
continue working for a year and invest all my investable income at 20%
per annum. I will have $18k, Lets say I start my business and
generate no income for a year. In 7.5 months, I would have spent my
whole savings, and would either need to borrow money from the bank, or
take out precious cashflow from the business, which may suffer as a
result.
I hope this tells you
sufficiently the difference between an asset and liability.
Let me give you another
example of what can happen if you have the correct financial
education. Lets say I need a place to stay, and rent a room for $350.
I would have $2338 in investable income. In one year, at 20% per
annum, I would have $30k Again, I start my business and generate no
income for a year. My savings would be depleted in 31 months. Hence,
I have 31 months to make my business work and generate sufficient
income (more than $1,250) to allow me to grow my money again (income
more than expenses).
I've mentioned that one
can be financially independent even if he is a person drawing salary.
Is it really possible? Lets take the same example as illustration.
Lets assume I sold off my property and put the entire amount into my
CPF special account, and could not touch it (ok its not possible as it
has exceeded the special account limit, but this is an illustration) I
start at zero again. At an income of $3,588 and expense of $1,250, I
have an investable income of $2,338. Lets say from now on, everytime I
get a pay increment, I increased my expenses by the same amount. My
investable income stays at $2,338. However, due to my financial
education, I continue to get 20% returns per annum on my money. This
would be my financial situation over time:-
Time(years)
Net worth
1 $30k
2 $68k
3 $114k
4 $169k
5 $237k
6 $320k
7 $422k
8 $545k
9 $695k
10 $879k
11 $1102k
In eleven years, I would
have a networth of $1.1M, assuming I can carry on making 20% per
annum. Lets say I cannot as I did not build up my financial education
sufficiently, but place it in S&P 500, an ETF instead at 15% per
annum. In 13 years, I would be worth $1.1M. Lets say I stop working
and take out 5% every year. My networth will still grow at 10% per
annum, and I would have at least $55k per annum to spend on. I would
still be financially independent, if that's my goal. Why do I say it
works? Well, I do have $350k in net worth now in just 3 years. This
works out to be 55% returns per annum. I think that's good result for
a small time player investing part time.
In summary, your passive
income determines your wealth. Once your passive income exceeds your
expenses, you would have achieved financial independence, which I am in
the process of attaining it with you. Will you travel with me in this
journey towards financial independence?? |